It a spiteful move from Oracle, they're finally throwing in the towel on OpenOffice.org development by offering to give the code and the trademark over to the Apache Foundation instead of the Document Foundation, the creators of the preeminent and widely-accepted fork of OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice. I can't figure out why for the life of me any other reason that Oracle would do this, other than from pure spite towards the Document Foundation. This article from ars technical talks about what this will mean if the Apache Foundation agrees to take over development of OpenOffice.org:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/06/oracle-spurns-libreoffic...
Comments
fox
Sun, 06/05/2011 - 7:25am
Permalink
OO or LO compatibility with MS Office
Unfortunately, neither version is presently usable for me in a collaborative academic environment. For example, numbered lines appear as part of the text when a Word document is translated into an OO or LO document. Until one or other of these versions gets the Word translations right, neither is that useful to me.
paladin
Fri, 06/10/2011 - 12:46am
Permalink
That's curious. I know I had
That's curious. I know I had an issue once with a document I shared with another educational colleague that ended up with lines across it. By numbered lines, do you mean a numbered list?